The AirAsia Airbus A320 in question (PK-AXC) seen here in 2010. On December
28, 2014 this plane
would be used on AirAsia Flight QZ8501 that is currently missing – Photo:
Bruno
Geiger | Flickr CC
Malaysian-owned
AirAsia Airbus A320 Flight QZ8501 Has Gone Missing
It's presumed to be at the bottom of the Java Sea.
Of course, we are all aware of the ‘dumb’ terrorist
bombs, some of which may have been planted by
the terrorists – licensed or unlicensed – while quite
a few others – such as that aboard the Pan Am 103
that crashed at Lockerbie, for example – was
obviously planted by the pros imitating ‘terrorists’…
What none of us heard of, however, are the ‘smart’
aircraft bombs – ‘bombs’ that don't blow up – and
contain no explosives. In a fly-by-wire aircraft,
such as all of the more recent Airbuses and Boeings,
such a ‘bomb’ could be one of the crucial blocks of
avionics capable of receiving satellite calls, which,
upon receiving a call carrying a certain code, would
simply incapacitate all controls. And
none would be
any wiser. That's how a great deal of damage can
be caused without any detectable malice – a sort of
an ‘act of God’ – like one of the Plagues of Egypt –
perpetrated on behalf of Jehovah's Chosen Ones…
And, need one recall here, that France,
where the
Airbus is manufactured and assembled, is as much
of a Jew colony by now as the good old JewEss of A.
France as a sovereign state governed by the likes
of General de Gaulle is as dead and buried as France
of Marshal Pétain. The last thing on earth the Jews
would tolerate is France governed by a patriot –
and, in this regard, de Gaulle, who presumed to have
a Middle Eastern policy of his own, was no better
than Pétain, as far as the Jews are concerned.
Back to the Jew Mossad air traffic situation
room in
I$raHell – or perhaps in Jakarta, Indonesia, as well.
The Jews can see this Malaysian Airbus approaching
the weather front, they can hear the exchange…
Now is the time to spring their Talmudic trap…
Die, goyim, die!
The Illegitimate Zionist Entity and Singapore:
A deep, dark, secret love affair - the
headline says it all
FYI. Singapore is the main airline maintenance hub
in South-East Asia.
From: Skip Baker
Irish:
The Forgotten White Slaves
When the
word slavery is mentioned the majority of people associate it with
the African slave trade.
Relatively few people know about Britian's shameful history involving the
selling of many hundreds of
thousands of Irish people as slaves to English settlers in the Americas, West
Indies and Australia
between 1641 and 1839.
IRISH: THE FORGOTTEN
WHITE SLAVES
IRISH:
THE FORGOTTEN WHITE SLAVES
They came as slaves: human cargo transported
on British ships bound for the Americas. They were shipped by the hundreds of
thousands and included men, women, and even the youngest of children.
Whenever they rebelled or even disobeyed an order, they were punished in the
harshest ways. Slave owners would hang their human property by their hands and
set their hands or feet on fire as one form of punishment. Some were burned
alive and had their heads placed on pikes in the marketplace as a warning to
other captives.
We don’t really need to go through all of the gory details, do we? We know all
too well the atrocities of the African slave trade.
But are we talking about African slavery? King James VI and Charles I also led
a continued effort to enslave the Irish. Britain’s Oliver Cromwell furthered
this practice of dehumanizing one’s next door neighbour.
The Irish slave trade began when James VI sold 30,000 Irish prisoners as slaves
to the New World. His Proclamation of 1625 required Irish political prisoners
be sent overseas and sold to English settlers in the West Indies.
By the mid 1600s, the Irish were the main slaves sold to Antigua and
Montserrat. At that time, 70% of the total population of Montserrat were Irish
slaves.
Ireland quickly became the biggest source of human livestock for English
merchants. The majority of the early slaves to the New World were actually
white.
From 1641 to 1652, over 500,000 Irish were killed by the English and another
300,000 were sold as slaves. Ireland’s population fell from about 1,500,000 to
600,000 in one single decade.
Families were ripped apart as the British did not allow Irish dads to take
their wives and children with them across the Atlantic. This led to a helpless
population of homeless women and children. Britain’s solution was to auction
them off as well.
During the 1650s, over 100,000 Irish children
between the ages of 10 and 14 were taken from their parents and sold as slaves
in the West Indies, Virginia and New England. In this decade, 52,000 Irish
(mostly women and children) were sold to Barbados and Virginia.
Another 30,000 Irish men and women were also transported and sold to the
highest bidder. In 1656, Cromwell ordered that 2000 Irish children be taken to
Jamaica and sold as slaves to English settlers.
Many people today will avoid calling the Irish slaves what they truly were:
Slaves. They’ll come up with terms like “Indentured Servants” to describe what
occurred to the Irish. However, in most cases from the 17th and 18th centuries,
Irish slaves were nothing more than human cattle.
As an example, the African slave trade was just beginning during this same
period. It is well recorded that African slaves, not tainted with the stain of
the hated Catholic theology and more expensive to purchase, were often treated
far better than their Irish counterparts.
African slaves were very expensive during the late 1600s (£50 Sterling). Irish
slaves came cheap (no more than £5 Sterling). If a planter whipped, branded or
beat an Irish slave to death, it was never a crime. A death was a monetary
setback, but far cheaper than killing a more expensive African.
The English masters quickly began breeding the Irish women for both their own
personal pleasure and for greater profit. Children of slaves were themselves
slaves, which increased the size of the master’s free workforce.
Even if an Irish woman somehow obtained her freedom, her kids would remain
slaves of her master. Thus, Irish mothers, even with this new found
emancipation, would seldom abandon their children and would remain in
servitude.
In time, the English thought of a better way to use these women to increase
their market share: The settlers began to breed Irish women and girls (many as
young as 12) with African men to produce slaves with a distinct complexion.
These new “mulatto” slaves brought a higher price than Irish livestock and,
likewise, enabled the settlers to save money rather than purchase new African
slaves.
This practice of interbreeding Irish females with African men went on for
several decades and was so widespread that, in 1681, legislation was passed
“forbidding the practice of mating Irish slave women to African slave men for
the purpose of producing slaves for sale.” In short, it was stopped only
because it interfered with the profits of a large slave transport company.
England continued to ship tens of thousands of Irish slaves for more than a
century. Records state that, after the 1798 Irish Rebellion, thousands of Irish
slaves were sold to both America and Australia. There were horrible abuses of
both African and Irish captives. One British ship even dumped 1,302 slaves into
the Atlantic Ocean so that the crew would have plenty of food to eat.
There is little question the Irish experienced the horrors of slavery as much
(if not more, in the 17th Century) as the Africans did. There is also little
question that those brown, tanned faces you witness in your travels to the West
Indies are very likely a combination of African and Irish ancestry.
In 1839, Britain finally decided on it’s own to end its participation in
Satan’s highway to hell and stopped transporting slaves. While their decision
did not stop pirates from doing what they desired, the new law slowly concluded
this chapter of Irish misery.
But, if anyone, black or white, believes that slavery was only an African experience,
then they’ve got it completely wrong. Irish slavery is a subject worth
remembering, not erasing from our memories.
But, why is it so seldom discussed? Do the memories of hundreds of thousands of
Irish victims not merit more than a mention from an unknown writer?
Or is their story to be the one that their English masters intended: To
completely disappear as if it never happened.
None of the Irish victims ever made it back to their homeland to describe their
ordeal. These are the lost slaves; the ones that time and biased history books
conveniently forgot.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/12/27/1265498/-The-slaves-that-time-forgot#
FRI DEC 27, 2013 AT 08:52 AM PST
The slaves that time forgot
by gjohnsit
We've all been taught the horror's of the African slave trade. It's in all the
school books and in plenty of Hollywood movies.
But for some reason the largest group of slaves in the British Colonies in the
17th Century doesn't get mentioned at all:
the Irish.
Most people have heard of the Great
Famine, which reduced the population of Ireland by around 25%.
That pales in comparison to the disaster that England inflicted upon Ireland
between 1641 and 1652,
when the population of Ireland fell from 1,466,000 to 616,000.
Then things got worse.
What to do with the Irish?
From the Tudor reconquest of Ireland until Irish
Independence in 1921, the English puzzled over the problem of what to do
with all those Irish people.
They were the wrong religion. They spoke the wrong language. But the big
problem was that there were just too many of them.
The English had been practicing a slow
genocide against the Irish since Queen Elizabeth, but the Irish bred too fast
and were tough to kill. On the other side of the Atlantic, there was a chronic
labor shortage (because the local natives tended to die out too quickly in
slavery conditions).
Putting two and two together, King James I started sending Irish slaves to the
new world.
The first
recorded sale of Irish slaves was to a settlement in the Amazon in 1612,
seven years before the first African slaves arrived in Jamestown.
The Proclamation of 1625 by James II made it
official policy that all Irish political prisoners be transported to the West
Indies and sold to English planters. Soon Irish slaves were the majority of slaves in the English colonies.
In 1629 a large group of Irish men and women were sent to Guiana, and by 1632,
Irish were the main slaves sold to Antigua and Montserrat in the West Indies.
By 1637 a census showed that 69% of the total population of Montserrat were
Irish slaves, which records show was a cause of concern to the English
planters. But there were not enough political prisoners to supply the demand,
so every petty infraction carried a sentence of transporting, and slaver gangs
combed the country sides to kidnap enough people to fill out their quotas.
The slavers were so full of zest that they sometimes grabbed non-Irishmen. On
March 25, 1659, a petition was received in London claiming that 72 Englishmen
were wrongly sold as slaves in Barbados, along with 200 Frenchmen and 7-8,000
Scots.
So many Irish slaves were sent to Barbados, between 12,000 and 60,000, that the
term"barbadosed" began to be used.
By the 1630's, Ireland was the primary source of the English slave trade.
And then disaster struck.
Cromwell
After Oliver Cromwell defeated the royalists in the English Civil War, he
turned to Ireland, who had allied themselves with the defeated royalists. What
happened next could be considered genocide.
The famine (caused by the English intentionally destroying foodstocks) and
plague that followed Cromwell's massacres reduced the population of Ireland to
around 40%.
And then Cromwell got really nasty.
Anyone implicated in the rebellion had their land confiscated and was sold into
slavery in the West Indies. Even catholic landowners who hadn't taken part of
the rebellion had their land confiscated.
Catholicism was outlawed and catholic priests were executed when found.
To top it off, he ordered the ethnic cleansing of Ireland east of Shannon in
1652. Soldiers were encouraged to kill any Irish who refused to relocate.
Instead of trying to describe the horror, consider the words from the English
State Papers in 1742.
"In clearing the
ground for the adventurers and soldiers (the English capitalists of that
day)... To be transported to Barbados and the English plantations in America.
It was a measure beneficial to Ireland, which was thus relieved of a
population that might trouble the planters; it was a benefit to the people
removed, which might thus be made English and Christians ... a great benefit to
the West India sugar planters, who desired men and boys for their bondsmen,
and the women and Irish girls... To solace them."
I can't help but notice that the exact same language and logic used to justify
enslavement of the blacks was used to justify enslavement of the Irish.
It is something for those who think slavery was simply a matter of skin color
to consider.
As for the Irish slaves, Cromwell specifically targeted Irish children.
“During the 1650s, over 100,000 Irish children between the ages of 10 and 14
were taken from their parents and sold as slaves in the West Indies, Virginia
and New England. In this decade, 52,000 Irish (mostly women and children) were
sold to Barbados and Virginia. Another 30,000 Irish men and women were also
transported and sold to the highest bidder. In 1656, [Oliver] Cromwell ordered
that 2000 Irish children be taken to Jamaica and sold as slaves to English
settlers.”
For some reason, history likes to call these Irish slaves as 'indentured
servants'. As if they were somehow considered better than African slaves. This
can be considered an attempt at whitewashing the history of the Irish slave
trade.
There does exist indentured servitude where two parties sign a contract for a
limited amount of time. This is not what happened to the Irish from 1625
onward. They were sold as slaves, pure and simple.
In reality, they were considered by some to be even lower than the blacks.
“...the
African slave trade was just beginning during this same period,” writes Martin.
“It is well recorded that African slaves, not tainted with the stain of the
hated Catholic theology and more expensive to purchase, were often treated far
better than their Irish counterparts.”
African slaves were still relatively new, and were expensive to transport such
a long distance (50 sterling in the late 1600's). Irish slaves on the other
hand, were relatively cheap in comparison (5 sterling).
If a planter whipped or branded or beat an Irish slave to death, it was never a
crime. A death was a monetary setback, but far cheaper than killing a more
expensive African. The English masters quickly began breeding the Irish women
for both their own personal pleasure and for greater profit. Children of slaves
were themselves slaves, which increased the size of the master’s free
workforce.
Because Irish slaves were so much cheaper, the loss of investment from
torturing and killing them was not considered an effective deterrent. In an
ironic twist, this caused some torecommend importing African slaves instead for humanitarian
reasons.
Colonel William Brayne wrote to English authorities in 1656 urging the
importation of Negro slaves on the grounds that, "as the planters would
have to pay much more for them, they would have an interest in preserving their
lives, which was wanting in the case of (Irish)...." many of whom, he
charged, were killed by overwork and cruel treatment. African Negroes cost
generally about 20 to 50 pounds Sterling, compared to 900 pounds of cotton
(about 5 pounds Sterling) for an Irish. They were also more durable in the hot
climate, and caused fewer problems. The biggest bonus with the Africans though,
was they were NOT Catholic, and any heathen pagan was better than an Irish
Papist.
"Truly,
I have seen cruelty there done to servants as I did not think one Christian
could have done to another." - Richard Ligon, 1657
It's impossible to estimate the exact number of Irish sold into slavery during
this period. More Irish slaves were sold in the American colonies between 1651
and 1660 than the entire free population of those colonies. In fact, more Irish
were sold as slaves in the America's during the 17th Century than Africans.
The typical death rate on the slave ships was around 37%.
The Irish did often have one advantage over African slaves - most of the time
their time in slavery was limited. They were often sold into slavery from 7 to
20 years, while the only way Africans could get out of slavery was to buy their
freedom.
While the number of Irish being sent into slavery dropped off considerably in
the 1660's, it did not just end.
After the Battle of the Boyne in 1691 there was another load of Irish slaves
sent to the new world. Following the failure of the 1798 Irish Rebellion there
were tens of thousands more Irish slaves.
Interesting historical note: the last person killed at the Salem Witch Trials
was Ann
Glover. She and her husband had been shipped to Barbados as a slave in the
1650's. Her husband was killed there for refusing to renounce catholicism.
In the 1680's she was working as a housekeeper in Salem. After some of the
children she was caring for got sick she was accused of being a witch.
At the trial they demanded she say the Lord's Prayer. She did so, but in
Gaelic, because she didn't know English. She was then hung.
ORIGINALLY POSTED TO GJOHNSIT ON FRI DEC 27, 2013 AT 08:52 AM PST.
Skip Baker
“Esau-Edom is modern Jewry.” 1925
Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. 5 page 41.
“Strictly speaking, it is incorrect
to call an ancient Israelite a “Jew” or to call
a contemporary Jew an Israelite or
Hebrew.” Jewish Almanac 1980, p. 3.
“Some call it Communism, I
call it Judaism.” Rabbi Stephen Weiss.
“Anti-Communism is
Anti-Semitism.” Jewish Voice, July - August 1941.
Skip Baker
