of 5
E.I.R.
STRATEGIC ALERT
WEEKLY NEWSLETTER
Volume 35, No. 46, November 18, 2021
SI Conference: Can the Western Powers
Admit Their Mistakes?
The Schiller Institute held an exciting, wide-ranging virtual
conference on Nov. 13-14 on the theme “All Moral Resources
of Humanity Have To Be Called Up: Mankind Must Be the Im-
mortal Species!”. In opening the proceedings, the chairwoman
of the Institute, Helga Zepp-LaRouche, gave an overview of
the current crises facing the world as a whole, as well as pro-
posals for introducing the changes needed, both in concrete
terms and culturally.
She began her keynote presentation, titled “A Terrible End,
or a New Paradigm”, by proposing what she called a “thought
experiment”. “It would actually be quite easy to solve almost
any of the many problems we are confronted with today, if
the majority of the governments of the European nations and
possibly even the United States administration would say, ‘OK,
we messed up. We have to change our way of thinking. We
committed a lot of mistakes.’”
Among the mistakes she went on to mention are the fa-
voring of financial speculation over the real economy, invest
-
ments in basic infrastructure and agriculture; the waging of
endless wars; the failure to overcome poverty in Africa; the
unnecessary turning of Russia and China into adversaries; the
privatization of the health system which has left us unable
to control the pandemic; and the spread of pseudo-scientific
propaganda about the climate, which has led to pessimism
and despair, in particular among the youth.
But is such a self-examination likely to happen, Helga Zepp-
LaRouche asked. “Unfortunately not, because so far, despite
one policy failure after the other, the establishments of the
West have shown zero capability to recognize and admit their
mistakes, and make the appropriate corrections.”
Strategically, she developed, the most pressing question is
whether the world can avoid a war among the major powers,
which would likely escalate into a nuclear war, as many have
warned. At the same time, Western powers must commit to
ending under-development in the world, and fighting poverty
and starvation, which are unquestionably among the worst
violations of human rights. In that respect, immediate action
should be taken to relieve two acute humanitarian crises – in
Afghanistan and in Haiti – with emergency deliveries of food,
medicine and fuel. (This aspect was taken up and elaborated
in several subsequent contributions to the conference.)
On the backdrop of the pandemic which continues to rage
globally, Helga Zepp-LaRouche stressed the urgency of build-
ing a modern health system in every nation, it being an illusion
for the developed countries to believe they could somehow
shut out the virus at the borders. For Afghanistan, she pro-
posed to call this initiative “Operation Ibn Sina”, in reference
to Avicenna or Ibn Sina (980-1037), the universal genius who
came from the region of modern-day Afghanistan, who was
not only the “father” of modern medicine, but also an out-
standing philosopher, astronomer, and scientist.
Operation Ibn Sina, Helga Zepp-LaRouche pointed out,
could also become a rallying point for cooperation among Rus-
sia, China, the United States and European nations on a com-
mon mission, which is advantageous for all. This “seed crys-
tal” could develop into the model of cooperation, free from
geopolitics, needed to bring about a positive new paradigm
in international relations. Concretely, Europe and the United
States should join in the Belt and Road Initiative launched by
China, she urged, which has already contributed so much to
ensuring real economic development.
In conclusion, Mrs. LaRouche stressed the importance of
studying the method of thinking of her late husband Lyn-
don LaRouche, in particular his development of the science of
physical economy, and of a culture worthy of mankind as the
only known creative species.
For a full list of speakers of the two-day conference,
please see the program appended to this issue of the
Strategic Alert.
The Antidote to Underdevelopment, Pseudo-
Science and Geopolitics: A Cultural Renaissance
All of the presentations at the Schiller Institute conference are
or soon will be available in video and in written form on the
SI websites, in various languages (
https://schillerinstitute.com/
blog/2021/11/11/
) . A full list of speakers and their topics,
taken from the program, is provided at the end of this Alert.
We would encourage our readers to follow the entire pro-
ceedings, if possible, or to select those presentations they are
most interested in. For space reasons, we can only give a brief
overview of the four panels here.
The first panel addressed the current strategic crises and
how to improve global relations so as to avoid war. It opened
with a video clip from a speech given by Lyndon LaRouche in
EIR
STRATEGIC ALERT
WEEKLY NEWSLETTER
2
N°46 / 2021
July, 2011 in Germany, which set the appropriate tone for the
two days of proceedings. “The most important of all strategic
questions we have to face today,” he posited provocatively,
“is the fact that the human species is absolutely unique in its
capabilities.” No other species that we know of, has the “cog-
nitive powers” of the human species. But we must use those
powers, that creativity, to ensure our survival and develop-
ment, he challenged the audience.
Helga Zepp-LaRouche was then followed by representatives
from Russia, including Ambassador Evstigneeva, the Deputy
Permanent Representative to the UN, and Dr. Andrey Kor
-
tunov, the Director General of the Russian International Af-
fairs Council (RIAC), as well as representatives from China,
and U.S. Colonel Richard Black (ret.), who are all very con-
cerned about the worsening of relations between their coun-
tries and the United States in particular.
The second panel was devoted to the “Science of Physi-
cal Economy” as the means to stop the dangerous hyperin-
flationary policies of today. One important section addressed
the specific problems of Afghanistan, including the need to
establish cooperation with the current government and to re-
lease the funds of the Afghans now frozen in western finan
-
cial institutions, as well as the problem of the international
drug trade. Reports were also given on the need to establish a
world health system as a basic element of physical economy.
Panel III was very timely, coming just at the conclusion of
the COP26 fiasco. Titled “There are no limits to growth in
the universe”, it brought together scientists and experts from
Germany, Russia, the Netherlands, Italy, South Africa and the
U.S., who refuted the fraudulent arguments of the so-called
“climate lobby”. They all deplored the extent to which politics,
ideology and money have taken over the scientific community,
with researchers and scientists capitulating to the “party line”
in order to receive funds and recognition. Rigorous debate has
become virtually impossible, as those who question the “con-
sensus” are immediately branded as “deniers” in the worst
tradition of the infamous Inquisition.
Finally, the last panel was devoted to “The Beauty of True
Human Culture”, with inspiring and thought-provoking pre-
sentations on how to design education systems so as to spark
creativity in the youth. It began, however, with a polemical
presentation by Jacques Cheminade on the degeneration of
western culture, as demonstrated in the video games showing
wanton killing, extreme violence and sexual perversity.
Helga Zepp-LaRouche closed this panel, and the conference,
by stressing the need for a cultural Renaissance which draws
on the best of every culture of human history, addressing
man’s relation to the universe, natural law and beauty.
COP26 Went into Overtime, But Still Could
Not Deliver a Deal To End Fossil Fuels
After two weeks of endless speeches, round tables and small-
er arm-twisting meetings, the COP26 had to be extended an
extra day in an attempt to come up with a minimal consensus
for a joint communique. The statement proposed on Nov. 12
by the organizers, in the person of COP26 President Alok
Sharma, included a watered-down section only committing the
signatory parties to accelerate “efforts towards the phase-out
of unabated coal power and inefficient fossil fuel subsidies,
recognizing the need for support towards a just transition”,
with no mention of a deadline or specific quantities.
But even that was contested. At the session on Nov. 13, In-
dia’s Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav again protested
against the demand that developing countries commit to elim-
inating the use of coal and stop subsidizing any fossil fuel. His
position was “echoed” by China, South Africa, Nigeria, Iran,
Venezuela and Cuba, according to the
Times of India
.
In the end, the term “phase-out of unabated coal power”
was changed to “phase-down”. Thus, the bankers, financiers
and royals pushing the “Great Reset” failed to intimidate ma-
jor nations into accepting the abandonment of fossil fuels,
fertilizers, cheap energy, etc. As a result, an Alok Sharma de-
scribed as “fighting back tears”, “apologized” on Nov. 13 “for
the way this process has unfolded. I am deeply sorry. I also
understand the deep disappointment but I think as you have
noted, it’s also vital that we protect this package.” John Kerry,
the U.S. climate envoy, snapped that he did not appreciate
the adjustment, but that it had to be done. “I’ll take ‘phase it
down’ and take the fight into next year.”
Environment Minister Yadav correctly pointed out, as Chi-
na’s leaders have also done, that fossil fuels have allowed the
world to “attain a high level of wealth and well-being”, in
particular the industrialized nations. Poorer nations also have
the right “to their fair share of the global carbon budget” and
to the use of such energy responsibly, he said. “Developing
countries have still to deal with their development agendas
and poverty eradication. Towards this end, subsidies provide
much needed social security and support.”
India and other developing nations, including in Africa, also
insisted that the developed countries finally make available
to poorer countries -- and increase -- the $100 billion per
year in funds for the transition they have pledged but never
delivered.
Now, given the refusal of so many governments to accept
the new “green colonialism”, the network of 450 financial
firms and corporations that Mark Carney has put together
– GFANZ (Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net-Zero) -- will
undoubtedly attempt to achieve their goals through financial
warfare, the cut-off of investments and other such means.
France Shifts the Tide toward Nuclear Energy
and Innovation, with State Intervention
The recent announcement by French President Emmanuel
Macron that France will construct new nuclear reactors, de-
velop small modular reactors (SMRs) and invest in new fourth
generation technologies, has sparked a growing momentum
throughout Europe in favor of nuclear energy. In a statement
on Oct. 12, he announced an investment plan of 30 billion
euros over five years to carry out “a strategy of innovation
and industrialization”.
The French President reiterated that commitment in a tele-
vised statement on Nov 9, saying that “for the first time in
decades, we are going to relaunch the construction of nuclear
reactors in our country”, while continuing to develop renew-
able energies. That was taken as confirmation that France
would proceed to build at least six new EPR reactors to re-
place those at the end of life cycle (cf.
SAS
44/21). For Em-
manuel Macron, this is needed to ensure reasonably priced
energy and to remain innovative in future-oriented technolo-
gies, at a time when the COVID pandemic has shown just how
vulnerable France has become and how dependent on foreign
countries for basic necessities.
EIR
STRATEGIC ALERT
WEEKLY NEWSLETTER
3
N°46 / 2021
To reverse that situation, Macron stated, “t
he market alone
is not enough. We need strong public intervention with, in
some key areas, significant investments
. Investments by the
Nation, and also by Europe.”
If Emmanuel Macron actually intends to carry through on
such a policy, it will require a drastic change in crucial areas,
of current EU policies – and not just energy. Moreover, it is
unclear how long he will remain in power, as new presidential
elections are scheduled to take place in April 2022.
While the German government has intervened at the EU
level against the French-led campaign for nuclear energy, it
has not convinced many others. In the Netherlands, the is-
sue is a prominent part of the ongoing talks to form a new
coalition government, with the right-wing liberal VVD and the
Christian Democrats (CDA) both in favor of building up to
eight nuclear power stations. Of the other two potential coali-
tion partners, the Christian Union is not opposed to nuclear
power in principle, while the D66 has doubts about both the
need and the cost.
As for Poland, Romania and Bulgaria, they reiterated at the
COP26 summit their commitment to nuclear power develop-
ment, with all three governments favoring the construction of
SMRs. In Spain, the governing Socialists maintain their position
in favor an exit from nuclear power altogether, but they are
opposed by the opposition parties Partido Popolar and Vox.
Perhaps most indicative of a shift in Europe is the case of
Italy, which did not sign an anti-nuclear statement together
with Germany and four other EU members states. According
to Italian environmental representatives, the government has
struck a deal with the French government, under which if
France backs the inclusion of natural gas in the EU taxonomy,
Italy will support the French initiative for the inclusion of
nuclear power. The situation in Germany, however, remains
worrisome, especially as the new government is expected to
be even “greener” than that of the outgoing one.
Migration Crisis: The EU Flaunts
Its Double Standards
Just as the COP26 extravaganza had to swallow its failure
to rally China and Russia behind the genocidal “decarboniza-
tion” policy, the trans-Atlantic Malthusian elites launched a
new provocation against Moscow, with the buildup of a crisis
at the Polish-Belarus border. In light of the European Union’s
double standard on refugees, the issue of who is responsible
for the presence of migrants at the Polish-Belarus border is
irrelevant.
Indeed, although Brussels supports the entrance of thou-
sands of refugees a day on its southern borders, through Italy,
they have backed the Polish decision to build a fence along
the border with Belarus. We all remember scenes of the Sea
Watch NGO ship carrying illegal immigrants that rammed an
Italian patrol boat in the port of Lampedusa only to receive
universal praise in European media and institutions. But when
the Polish border police beat ID-carrying refugees, in disre-
gard of the extreme weather conditions that have already
killed dozens, it’s Minsk that Brussels accuses of using “gang-
ster methods” while EU member states send troops to the
area in solidarity with Warsaw.
Behind such double standards is a political motivation: es-
calate the confrontation with Russia. On Nov. 15, EU Foreign
Ministers announced new sanctions against Belarus, and pos-
sibly against two airline companies used by the refugees to
reach Minsk: Aeroflot and Turkish Airlines. The Polish press
agency
PAP
reported on Nov. 14 that Poland is in consulta-
tions with Lithuania and Latvia about invoking Art. 4 of NATO.
This, at a time when Russia is conducting joint military ma-
neuvers with Minsk in Belarus territory. And one need not be
a conspiracy theorist to understand that the suspension of
certification for Nord Stream 2, announced by the German
regulator on Nov. 16, is related to this crisis.
Russian President Vladimir Putin, in a Nov. 13 interview
with Pavel Zarubin, clearly put the blame for the crisis on the
West. The problems at the root of the migration crises, that
are political, military and economic were caused by Western
countries, including European countries, he said, mentioning
both the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Putin also stressed that
Russia has “absolutely nothing to do with any of this. They are
trying to shift the responsibility to us at the slightest pretext
or even without any pretext.”
As Dr. Andrey Kortunov, Director General of the Russian
International Affairs Council, pointed out at the Schiller In-
stitute international conference on Nov. 13, the first step
to de-escalate the crisis is for the two sides to engage talks.
However, the EU, the U.S., Canada and the United Kingdom
imposed sanctions on Belarus in 2020 and do not recognize
Lukashenko as the legitimate President.
How can you solve a border dispute if you don’t recognize
your neighbor? What can you hope to achieve with measures,
such as sanctions, that have never worked anywhere and
only impose suffering on the population? After all, sanctions
against Syria are the main reason why Syrian citizens are now
fleeing their country and seek refuge in the EU through the
Polish border.
In this context, the decision by Angela Merkel to hold two
telephone calls with Lukashenko on Nov. 15, and Emmanuel
Macron’s 105 minutes phone discussion with Vladimir Putin on
the Polish-Belarus crisis are useful, albeit insufficient steps.
Inflation and Collapsing Infrastructure in
the U.S.: The Chickens Come Home To Roost
Inflation in the United States was up to 6.2
% in October,
reflecting not only an increase vis a vis the September 5.2%
figure, but also a worrying increase in the rate of increase. US
Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen reacted by attributing the rise
to the pandemic. In a sense, she is partially right, but only in
terms of the policy answer to the pandemic.
In fact, the two main drivers of inflation – energy and used
cars – reflect a scarcity of those goods on the supply side,
superficially explained as the lack of productive capacity which
was lost during the lockdowns. However, financial speculation
amplified the effect of such a supply-demand mechanism, by
investing trillion of dollars in bets on energy commodities, in
addition to the evidence of classical hoarding of microchips,
which affects the automobile sector.
That large liquidity has been made available to the finan
-
cial system by the policy of central banks and governments
combined. Following the Sept. 2019 breakdown of the repo
market, the US Treasury, the Federal Reserve and the Euro-
pean Central Bank pumped over $14 trillion into the system,
most of which went to financial speculation, a small part to
consumption – as necessary support for households - and
nothing to investments. No new productive employment, of
EIR
STRATEGIC ALERT
WEEKLY NEWSLETTER
4
N°46 / 2021
any kind, has been created since the breakdown began and
the Federal Reserve began QE5. The only legislation in years
that might have added some employment in construction and
engineering, i.e., the pending “bipartisan infrastructure bill”,
has been deliberately postponed by the Democratic majority
in Congress, who are trying to obtain $3.5 trillion more in
“household aid” first.
The result of that liquidity is that, besides the leverage of-
fered to speculators in commodities, the US trade deficit has
doubled: $80 billion in Sept. 2021 as compared to $40 bn
one year before. US households spent the money at their dis-
posal to buy goods that the US no longer produces, thanks to
deindustrialization, and that must come from abroad.
This also explains the breakdown of the West Coast ocean
freight.
Marine Exchange
reported on Nov. 9 that there were
168 ships of all kinds stuck there, 103 of them “at anchor or
loitering” and the rest in port. Of those, 111 are container
ships, 81 of which are “at anchor or loitering.” In mid-Sep-
tember, there were 70 container ships at these ports, a figure
that shot up to 107 on Oct. 21, which was the record until
this report for Nov. 9.
According to a very detailed account given by a long-distance
trucker posted on Oct. 27 by Ryan Johnson, and re-posted by
Zero Hedge
, the “shortage of truck drivers” servicing freight
is not limited to those ports, but widespread in the country.
Most trucking companies and drivers, he said, “avoid port
loading business like a plague” because the amount of unpaid
time they spend waiting around the ports can bankrupt them.
This experienced trucker places the blame for the worsening
transport breakdown exactly where it belongs -- on the lack
of infrastructure. In almost all ports, he says, there is only one
crane for every 50 trucks looking for cargo, and since there
is virtually no rail capability to move freight, it all has to travel
by road. This trucker has much more of interest to say, but
the basic message is: America does not have the transporta-
tion infrastructure to ship its own freight.
Schiller Institute International Conference, November 13-14, 2021
All Moral Resources of Humanity Have To Be Called Up:
Mankind Must Be the Immortal Species!
Panel 1: Can a Strategic Crisis Between
the Major Powers Be Avoided?
“Creativity as Such”
Lyndon H. LaRouche Jr. (1922-2019), co-founder of the
Schiller Institute
“A Terrible End or a New Paradigm?”
Helga Zepp-LaRouche (Germany), founder of the
international Schiller Institutes
“Major Country Relations and Global Development”
Ms. Chen Xiohan (China), Deputy Secretary General, Chinese
People’s Association for Peace and Disarmament (CPAPD)
“The Situation in Afghanistan After Foreign Troops’
Withdrawal”
Ambassador Anna Evstigneeva (Russia), Deputy Permanent
Representative, the Russian Federation Mission to the UN
“Is There a Pathway for an Improved Relationship
Between the U.S. and Russia?”
Dr. Andrey Kortunov (Russia), Director General, Russian
International Affairs Council (RIAC)
“U.S.-China Relations: Potential for War Avoidance
and Cooperation”
Col. Richard H. Black (USA, ret.), former chief, Criminal
Law Division, Office of the Judge Advocate General, the
Pentagon.
“The Survival of Our World Depends on Whether the
U.S. and China Can Get Along”
Dr. George Koo (U.S.), Chairman, Burlingame Foundation;
Retired international business consultant
“Brotherhood is the Best Wealth”
Kirk Wiebe (U.S.), Senior Analyst (ret.), U.S. National
Security Agency (NSA); member, Veteran Intelligence
Professionals for Sanity (VIPS)
Greetings to the Conference
Gen. Edwin De La Fuenta Jeria, former Commander-in-Chief,
Armed Forces of Bolivia.
Discussants
: Madison Tang
(
U.S.), CODEPINK: Women
for Peace;
Dr.
Nikolay Megits (U.S.), President, Institute of
Eastern Europe and Central Asia; Earl Rasmussen (U.S.),
Executive Vice President, The Eurasia Center
Panel 2: The Science of Physical Economy
“Stopping Today’s Hyperinflationary Policies.”
Paul Gallagher (U.S.), Co-Editor,
Executive Intelligence
Review
“Avoiding the Coming Catastrophe in Afghanistan”
Dr. Pino Arlacchi (Italy), Sociology Professor, Sassari
University; former Executive Director, UN Office for Drug
Control and Crime Prevention; former European Parliament
Rapporteur on Afghanistan
“Socioeconomic Conditions in Afghanistan and the
Role of Global Community”
Mrs. Amna Malik (Pakistan), President, Center of Pakistan
and International Relations (COPAIR)
“How to Avoid a Collapsing Economy and Humanitarian
Crisis in Afghanistan”
Dr. Shah Mehrabi (Afghanistan), Member, Board of
Governors, Central Bank of Afghanistan (DAB) and Chairman
of Audit Committee
Discussants
: Helga Zepp
-
LaRouche; Iliad Alexander Terra
(U.S.), founder and President, Council on Global Relations
“A Strategy for Destroying Dope, Inc.in the 21st Century
“
Dennis Small (U.S.), Ibero-American Director,
Executive
Intelligence Review
“Make the Schiller Institute Plan to Develop Haiti
Known Everywhere”
Billy Anders Estimé (Haiti), Co-Founder, Café Diplo Haiti
“Haiti and Afghanistan: Needed Lessons for Nation
Building, Not Chaos”
Eric Walcott (U.S.), Director, Strategic Partnerships, Institute
of Caribbean Studies, Washington, DC
EIR
STRATEGIC ALERT
WEEKLY NEWSLETTER
5
n°46 / 2021
E.I.R. STRATEGIC ALERT
www.eir.de
Published by: E.I.R.GmbH, Bahnstr. 4, 65205 Wiesbaden
Tel.: 0611/73650, Fax: 0611/9740935, Email: info@eir.com
Verantwortl. f. d. Inhalt: Dean Andromidas, Claudio Celani
Subscription: EUR 3000/ ISSN 0936-7527
© E.I.R. GmbH
Alle Rechte vorbehalten, auch die des Nachdrucks
von Auszügen, derphotomechanischen Wiedergabe und der Übersetzung,
Printed in Germany
“Infrastructure and Education: Key to Developing Haiti
and the Dominican Republic”
Domingo Reyes (Dominican Republic), former professor of
Economics
“The Urgent Need for a World Health System—Not To
Care is Unforgivable”
Dr. Joycelyn Elders (U.S.), former U.S.Surgeon General
“The Potential of U.S. Reserve Army Units To Aid in
Economic Reconstruction in the U.S. and Around the
World”
Major General (ret.) Carroll D. Childers (U.S.), former
Commanding General of the only light division in the
National Guard Reserve Components for VA, MD, MA, CT
and NJ
“The Urgent Need for a World Health System—Not To
Care is Unforgivable”
Dr. Joycelyn Elders (U.S.), former United States Surgeon
General
“The Potential of U.S. Reserve Army Units To Aid in
Economic Reconstruction in the U.S. and Around the
World”
Major General (ret.) Carroll D. Childers (U.S.), former
Commanding General of the only light division in the National
Guard Reserve Components for Va, Md, Ma, Ct and NJ
“Community Healthcare Workers in D.C.—Now A
Model for the World”
Dr. Walter Faggett (U.S.), former Chief Medical Officer,
Washington, DC Department of Health; Co-Chair D.C. Ward
8 Health Council
“Healthcare is a Basic Human Right, Not a Privilege”
Dr. Ernest L. Johnson, Jr. (U.S.), President Emeritus,
Louisiana State NAACP; civil rights attorney; Professor of
Law, Southern University Law Center, Baton Rouge, LA
“Under the Guise of ‘Nature Conservation,’ the Spectre
of Starvation Stalks Germany”
Alf Schmidt (Germany), independent farmer; leader of
farmers demonstrations in Berlin
“Greetings from The Kansas Cattlemen’s Association
Annual Conference”
Robert Baker (U.S.), Agriculture Advisor, Schiller Institute;
Riley Robbins, President, KCA; John Ney, Vice President, KCA.
Panel 3: There Are No Limits to Growth
in the Universe
“The LaRouche Movement’s Role in Defeating
Malthusianism”
Jason Ross (U.S.), Science Advisor, the Schiller Institute
“A Message to the Young People at COP26”
Dr. Augustinus Berkhout (Netherlands), Emeritus Professor
of Geophysics, Delft University of Technology; Member,
Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences
“Earthquake Forecasting at the Frontiers of Science”
Prof. Sergey Pulinets (Russia), Space Research Institute,
Moscow; Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS).
“On Sustainability”
Prof. Carl-Otto Weiss, PhD (Germany), Advisor, European
Institute for Climate and Energy; former President, National
Metrology Institute of Germany, Braunschweig, Germany
“A COP26 Post-Mortem: End Eco-Colonialism Through
Climate Truth”
Dr. Kelvin Kemm (South Africa), former Chairman, South
African Nuclear Energy Corporation (NECSA); current
Director and CEO, Stratek Business Strategy Consultants,
based in Pretoria.
“Stop the Weaponization of Science—Fooling the
Public Through ‘Better Science’”
State Senator Mike Thompson (U.S.-Kansas), Kansas State
Senate; Chairman, Senate Utilities Committee
“Nobel Winners’ Climate Models are Wrong”
Prof. Franco Battaglia (Italy), Professor of Physical
Chemistry, University of Modena; Member, Initiating
Committee of the Petition on Anthropogenic Global Warming
of June 2019 (Italy)
Panel 4: The Beauty of True Human Culture
“Squid Game and Other Things to Come”
Jacques Cheminade (France), Président, Solidarité et Progrès
“Education: Race Against Time”
Prof. Zaher Wahab (Afghanistan), Professor Emeritus of
Education; former Advisor, Afghanistan Minister of Higher
Education
“The Chinese Commitment to Education as Observed
by an American Teacher”
Denise Rainey (U.S.), retired educator and principal,
Rochester, NY
“On the Aesthetic Education in China”
Xu Wang (China), Executive Dean, Boao Culture and
Creativity Institute
“On Education”
Prof. Ole Döring, PhD (Germany), Sinologist and Philosopher
“How the World Health Platform Will Save the Future
of the West”
Diane Sare (U.S.), Founder, Schiller Institute NYC Chorus
Concluding Remarks
Helga Zepp-LaRouche
All of the presentations are or soon will be available in
video and in written form on the SI websites, in various
languages (https://schillerinstitute.com/blog/2021/11/11/
)
No comments:
Post a Comment