----- Original Message -----
From: Len Cranford
To: apopeeso@comcast.net ; pyrigenes
; Chris
D.
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 6:06 AM
Subject: Peace and Brotherhood Eh?
[White people! Hang on to
your Guns!!!]
Oh boy, this is rich.
Homeland
Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said on Sunday that President Obama’s decision
not to say the actions of the Islamic State is a form of “radical Islam” is at
the behest of the Muslim community.
“The
thing I hear from leaders in the Muslim community in this country is ISIL is
attempting to hijack my religion,” Johnson told “Fox News Sunday,” referring to
the terror group also known as Islamic State, or ISIS.
Johnson
said the leaders argue their religion is about peace and brotherhood and
“resent” that Islamic State is “attempting to hijack that from us.”
Really?
So about those huge hoards, numbering in the tens, hundreds of thousands or millionsthat took to the streets all across the Muslim world to cheer after 9/11 -- those aren't really "Muslims"?
Or how about all of those who cheered the Hebro assault? Those weren't really Muslims either?
You can make the argument that the various Islamic Terrorists aren't really part of the "Muslim" faith right up until a huge groups of so-called "peaceful" Muslims show up in the street burning American flags and cheering for what the terrorists have done.
At that point the excuse evaporates like a pig-fart in your closest mosque.
It is an absolute lie to say that these terrorist acts are not "motivated" by Islam. They most-certainly are. Further, the Muslim faith claims there will be another "Caliphate", which ISIS has put their stake in the ground and said they intend to, and are, establishing.
Do these "Muslim" groups renounce, in public, continually and permanently, any claim to desire or "look forward" to a Islamic Caliphate? Have they written this out of their version of the Queeran? If they have, could some of them please let us know where we can find said versions of their "Holy Book" in wide circulation, so we can discover for ourselves whether allreferences and associations to "dhimmi" or "dhimmitude" have been removed from said book and teachings?
No?
Why the hell not? Might that be because they're lying?
Have a big helping of BACON, Mr. Johnson.
PS: I'm not alone in this analysis, upon which I've propounded since before there was a Ticker, and in fact going back to the USS Cole. You can find another viewpoint oddly similar right here. Or you can look to the problems the nascent United States had with Muslim Piracy (yes, real piracy on the water) if you're inclined to pay attention to a bit of history, and how our government viewed it at the time (correctly so, I might add.)
[Google; Muslim Medieval Piracy,
Slavery]
----- Original Message -----
From: Christopher Woods
No comments:
Post a Comment