----- Original Message -----
From: Len Cranford
To: apopeeso@comcast.net ; pyrigenes
; Chris
D.
Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2015 1:56 AM
Subject: Pictured: See The Facebook Post That Officially Has Muslims
PISSED OFF [2nd link below;]
{Dat Nigga, Representing the modern
day Sodom and Gomorrah; I`ll say it again; Mud-Races contribute nothing
in elevated standards. Like Jew-Liberals, the only technique offered is to
destroy the White Race Civilizations. After so many corrupt individuals
in the White House why would a "good" person be willing to stay
there? Seems like too many bad spirits would be hanging around causing too much
bad Karma. Meanwhile, dat Nigga only offers to make da White House look
like a Nigga Dive in South Los Angeles! ;;;}
http://mashable.com/2015/06/26/white-house-rainbow-lights/
Commie-Obama
and the Liberals just made the Confederate Battle Flag brighter, more
beautiful, more relevant, more necessary;
Whites can go even
further;
The
ancient "Religious" Version of the "Swastika" is
much older and stronger than your weak-polluted Christianity. Take a look;
This first one; est. 450BC. WHERE your Christian cross came
from. Dating back to ancient Troy, Phoenicia, Egypt, and Sumeria. But
go ahead, keep being modern idiots, tricked by the lying Jews, ad
infinitum continuum.450BC ancient Briton; [modern Scotland!] 1500BC. Archeology of ancient Troy; [Watch the fun movie "Troy" w/Brad Pitt as Achilles. Not quite accurate to Homer`s Iliad but an excellent view of 1500 BC. and the Iliad it`self. The story, 3500 Years old and still popular!!!]
----- Original Message -----
From: Christopher Woods
Subject: Pictured: See The Facebook Post That Officially Has Muslims
PISSED OFF [tells the awful TRUTH too!]
http://madworldnews.com/pictured-facebook-post-muslims/
AND HERE; Denninger also; http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=230271
Really?
REALLY?
Everywhere and anywhere now is banning the Confederate Battle Flag because some jackass shot up a church and it was pretty-clearly a racist attack? [It may be another fake like Sandy Hook too!]
Did we ban the "Queeran" -- or prayer mats -- after Hasan shot up a military facility?
No?
Well?
We damn well ought to put historical fact on the Confederacy in the first place; the sole cause was not slavery, although that certainly was a part of it.
Let's remember that while the Cotton Gin (invented in 1793) greatly increased the production of finished product the same stride forward in technology that produced it also led to the introduction of mechanization of farm labor and that slavery was economically defunct at the time of Lincoln's election. The Northern states knew it too; the "institution" of slavery was rapidly becoming uneconomic and was destined to die all on its own for economic reasons within a decade. There was no need to go to war over the issue as the machines were vastly more efficient in terms of per-unit labor cost (by a factor of 10 or more!) than human slaves.
Then there were economic factors and the bleeding of the southern states by northern business interests. Oh, where have we heard this of late? Might it be in those "mighty" NY banks in 2008? Oh yes, I think it was. Well, it happened then too -- this is from Georgia's actual declaration of secession:
The
material prosperity of the North was greatly dependent on the Federal
Government; that of the South not at all. In the first years of the Republic the
navigating, commercial, and manufacturing interests of the North began to seek
profit and aggrandizement at the expense of the agricultural interests. Even
the owners of fishing smacks sought and obtained bounties for pursuing their
own business (which yet continue), and $500,000 is now paid them annually out
of the Treasury. The
navigating interests begged for protection against foreign shipbuilders and
against competition in the coasting trade.
Congress
granted both requests, and by prohibitory acts gave an absolute monopoly of
this business to each of their interests, which they enjoy without diminution
to this day. Not content with these great and unjust advantages, they have
sought to throw the legitimate burden of their business as much as possible
upon the public; they have succeeded in throwing the cost of light-houses,
buoys, and the maintenance of their seamen upon the Treasury, and the
Government now pays above $2,000,000 annually for the support of these objects.
Theses interests, in connection with the commercial and manufacturing classes,
have also succeeded, by means of subventions to mail steamers and the reduction
in postage, in relieving their business from the payment of about $7,000,000
annually, throwing it upon the public Treasury under the name of postal
deficiency.
That was a hell of a lot of money at the time, by the way.
Never mind the blatant refusal to deliver up fugitives. Today there is a substantial disconnect on the legality of marijuana, for example. In Colorado it is legal to possess and smoke it, along with delivering it provided you're licensed. What do you think would be the response if someone from a neighboring state was dealing drugs, fled to Colorado and the State of Colorado refused to return them to the state where the law was allegedly violated to stand trial and threatened to kill anyone who attempted to capture and return them to the other state? What if people in Colorado were inciting the drug dealing in neighboring states by making clear, public statements that they would not extradite any dealer that got to their state before being arrested? That was routine during the years before the Civil War, never mind those those seeking the return of fugitives were frequently murdered (and those committing the murders were not only not prosecuted they were celebrated!)
So over all this we had a war. A bloody, nasty war. A war in which, I remind you, the Northern troops committed acts that by any reasonable standard were blatant, outrageous war crimes, including literally incinerating everything in their path -- human, animal and property.
This is not speculation and I'm not referring to Sherman either; I'm actually referring to Grant's order to General Sheridan to literally destroy the Shenandoah Valley -- a task he took upon himself and completed. There were literally hundreds turned out of their homes as they were burned to ash along with their barns, hay and grains in the late summer. These were not soldiers or combatants; they were civilian families and included among them Mennonites -- a non-violent religious sect that opposed both secession and slavery and had refused to engage in hostilities of any sort.
And none of this -- exactly none -- was ever prosecuted. In fact today there's damn little recognition of the military tactics used and the destruction inflicted on those who waged no war and in fact wanted nothing to do with it on either side. I note that virtually all of that harm was inflicted on southern individuals and their property.
Next you can tell me how you square this with what is being alleged is an actual government order to stop selling confederate flags. I'm not sure I buy the "government order" claim, by the way, but there sure has been a hell of a lock-step move by an awful lot of businesses all at once doing the same thing -- including eBAY, Amazon, Apple and WalMart.
Hmmmm.
Is there a race problem in America? Oh hell yeah. But just as we don't ban Queerans because some Islamic nutjob tries to shoot up a cartoon contest, or another Islamic nutjob tries and succeeds in shooting up a military base exactly what sort of horsecrap is it to call not only for banning pieces of cloth with particular markings on them but also to demand the removal of statutes and other historical artifacts of a war that both didn't have to be fought and damn well ought to be remembered not just for its causes but for the atrocities committed during that time?
How far from Nazi Germany (or Saddam's Iraq!) are we when we ban pieces of cloth and tear down statutes?
No comments:
Post a Comment